I do not profess to have special knowledge of the area, but I grew up hearing stories of the old days along the river; dry-land farming, windstorms; irrigation and water wars. And thus it is that while the tales being presented are strictly fictional, figments of my imagination, they contain elements that bear similarities to life as it was lived. There is truth in fact, and there is truth in fiction.
The West may have been won with six-guns and carbines, but the prize without water is not worth the taking. Ergo, water disputes, rights and acquisition thereof, have been part and parcel of much of the West since the beginning of the conquest. The waters of the Arkansas rise in the high Rockies of Central Colorado and as the Spring melt of winter snows heads eastward, the great river carries potential for human settlement and agriculture. Where there is water, there are conflicting claims. Disputes over water rights have jammed the court system from the beginning, and I daresay that if one were to pursue it, he would find that there are pending cases and cases in progress related to Arkansas Valley water rights to this very hour. Dry-land farming has been practiced with greater and lesser success from year to year in Southeastern Colorado since the first settlers arrived. But near the river, irrigation has been practiced since the first ditch was dug to divert water onto farmland.
In the latter quarter of the nineteenth century, sugar beets were introduced into this country, and two areas of Colorado were found to be ideal for this crop when water was available. According to The American Sugar Beet Growers' Association, the first sugar factory for processing beets in the United States was erected in 1879. By 1917 there were 91 such plants in 18 states from Michigan to California. The Arkansas River Valley was prime land, and there was river water to be had. Many little towns, including Holly, Swink, and Hartman where I was born, had mills pouring out sugar for the market by the carload. "Dirty, ugly roots in one end, sparkling white crystalline sweetness out the other." What a deal! The beet growers were blessed, too, in that, unlike cane which required a "double processing," beet sugar could be obtained in a single process.
Image: sciencedaily.com
But there was the water issue. By 1893 the Amity Canal Company had filed for water rights. A few years later Holbrook was granted rights. There arose a dispute in which Holbrook claimed that by taking full draw on their rights Amity was depriving Holbrook of its grant.
To Law! Bring on the lawyers, get to court. In 1920 or '21, Holbrook sued Amity in Circuit Court. Amity successfully defended its position and in 1921 the court so declared. But that is not the end of it. It never is. In 1929 Holbrook filed in District Court and the matter was heard yet again, and again Amity prevailed. It went to Appellate Court in 1931. Amity prevailed.*
Or should I say, the lawyers won. They always do, no matter how the court rules.
*Information extracted from leagle.com.
Jesus answered and said unto her, Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again: but whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life. John 4:13,14 (KJV)
